The research is a meta-analysis that circumscribes General Communication Science (Axis Communication Philosophy). The thinking platform has two principled pillars:\n i) that discourse has three “main dimensions”: “language use”, “communication of beliefs (cognition)”, and “interaction in situations”; as a “standard principle” (Van Dijk, 1997a, 1997b). \n ii) that, as a written language form of communication, the philosophy is a communicational cognition discourse.\n The inquiry is ranged among what it is called the dynamics of the reshaping conceptual standard-matrix of Communication. It is an implicit answer to a double question: i) what makes a communicational discourse be „philosophy” and ii) what accurately individualizes the philosophical discourse, making from a text „a philosophical text”, a philosophical discourse, a philosophical message? Results that:\n 1. essential in the philosophical communication, as well as in any other type of communicational discourse, it is not the producer but the nuclear message which he succeeds in transmitting and co-constructing meanings together with his recipient;\n 2. the distinctive feature of the philosophical communication, of the philosophical discourse, of the philosophical text as a communication practice is the discursive approach of the philosophemes, the „philosophematic” message.